Earlier this month, the Trump administration made nine elite universities an offer they couldn’t refuse: bring in more conservatives while shutting down “institutional units that purposefully punish, belittle, and even spark violence against conservative ideas,” give up control of admissions and hiring decisions, agree to “biological” definitions of sex and gender, don’t raise tuition for five years, clamp down on student protests, and stay institutionally “neutral” on current events. Do this and you won’t be cut off from “federal benefits,” which could include research funding, student loans, federal contracts, and even student and faculty immigration visas. Instead, you may gain “substantial and meaningful federal grants.”
But the universities are refusing. With the initial deadline of October 20 approaching, four of the nine universities—the University of Pennsylvania, Brown, University of Southern California, and MIT—that received the federal “compact” have announced that they will not sign it.
In addition, the American Council on Education, which represents more than 1,600 colleges and universities, today issued a statement calling for the compact to be completely withdrawn.
This post highlights an important and timely issue in higher education. It’s interesting to see how universities are responding to the proposed changes. It will be intriguing to follow the developments as the deadline approaches.
the responses from these universities could shape future policies. The differing viewpoints on Trump’s compact reveal the complexities of balancing federal influence and institutional autonomy in education. It will be fascinating to watch how this situation unfolds and affects the broader landscape of higher education.
Absolutely, the universities’ responses will likely influence not only future policy discussions but also how higher education institutions engage with government initiatives. It’s interesting to consider how this situation might set a precedent for other administrations and their approaches to higher education reform.