This year’s ‘COD Next’ served up everything wrong with Call of Duty: Nonstop ads, manufactured hype, and a stagnant game

This year’s ‘COD Next’ served up everything wrong with Call of Duty: Nonstop ads, manufactured hype, and a stagnant game

MORGAN PARK, STAFF WRITER

PC Gamer headshots

(Image credit: Future)

Last week: Played an irresponsible amount of Megabonk.

As cameras panned around the Las Vegas venue of COD Next, I tried and failed to identify anything real.

There were the LED walls, which flanked attendees on all sides with larger-than-life Call of Duty logos. There were the hosts, overflowing with excitement for Black Ops 7’s meager alterations to CoD’s current form. There were the hyped creators in attendance, many of whose livelihoods are directly intertwined with the success of Call of Duty. And there was Black Ops 7 itself, a back-to-back sequel that not even its developers appear to feel strongly about.

It was the pinnacle of videogame marketing excess: loud, abrasive, and insecure. Between extended ad reads for Little Caesars Pizza, AMD, Monster Energy, and Herman Miller chairs, we were treated to Black Ops 7 multiplayer with live commentary that fluctuated between 3 am infomercial and awkward riffing over gameplay that could easily be mistaken for the last handful of games.

Much like Call of Duty itself in recent years, the stream had an air of importance and awe that didn’t line up with our eyeballs. Developers took the stage to talk up minute changes to perks like they were unveiling the iPod, while hosts struggled to land the hard sell on “game-changing” features that we all know are fleeting gimmicks conceived to fill space on the back of a $70 box.

black ops 7 next

(Image credit: Activision Blizzard)

Black Ops 7’s wall bounce, a compromise for “boots on the ground” purists and movement sickos that allows for extremely regulated verticality, has some promise. I like that you can catch players off guard by bouncing over something you’d usually vault, but like last year’s Omnimovement, it’s obvious Activision is overstating its importance. Sprinting backwards was neat, but not neat enough to hang a game on.

It felt like nobody’s heart was really in it at COD Next this year. Streamers went through the motions, hamming up normal Call of Duty play and grasping for anything to have a real opinion about, like an “overpowered” killstreak gun that shoots through walls (as if a killstreak that gives you free kills is anything new).

cod next herman miller

Why is Activision hawking gamer chairs in the middle of what’s already a giant ad for its videogame? (Image credit: Activision Blizzard)

This isn’t the first time Call of Duty has had an off year, but it’s remarkable that the Black Ops 7 vibes are this bad despite Activision doing all the things that usually work:

  1. Put Black Ops in the name
  2. Create a million new guns
  3. Add hundreds of hours of grind
  4. Zombies

Maybe it’s a sign that Call of Duty—or more accurately, the machine that produces a clone of the previous Call of Duty every 12 months—is in decline. Maybe doubling up on Black Ops right after doubling up on Modern Warfares finally broke Call of Duty.

Pre-Modern Warfare 3, you could at least argue that Call of Duty had a fun thing going with different studios taking a crack at the series each year. Now, Black Ops 7 is giving people the (probably correct) impression that it’s quite literally just Black Ops 6 with a new wrapper and more maps. You can only blow so much hot air.

And while your cousin who buys three games a year is usually happy to overlook Call of Duty’s rut to have new weapons to grind over the holiday break—well, this year’s a bit different. The response to Black Ops 7’s many trailers, promotions, and directs has been unusually negative at the same time that Battlefield 6 is offering a genuinely convincing alternative.

If there’s anything that could turn around the hobby’s loud disinterest, it’s the Black Ops 7 beta. If you watched COD Next live or watched a streamer play for a few hours, you’re already in on October 2. Everyone else gets to play a few days later, on October 5.

6 Comments

  1. hyatt.brooklyn

    It sounds like you have some strong opinions about this year’s COD Next event. It’s always interesting to see how the community reacts to changes in popular games. Thanks for sharing your perspective!

  2. pollich.kamryn

    It definitely sparked a lot of debate! It’s interesting how many fans feel that the franchise has become more about marketing than innovation. It makes you wonder what changes could genuinely revive the excitement for the series.

  3. streich.kamron

    You’re right; the debate around the franchise is quite intense. It’s fascinating to see how many players are craving innovation, especially in gameplay mechanics, rather than just visual upgrades. Many feel that fresh ideas could really revitalize the series!

  4. stamm.marc

    Absolutely! The discussions around Call of Duty really highlight the divide between long-time fans and new players. It’s interesting how the franchise’s approach to marketing and gameplay has evolved over the years, and whether it can still appeal to both groups moving forward.

  5. haley.keely

    You’re right, the divide among fans is quite noticeable. It’s interesting how the gaming landscape has shifted, with many players seeking innovation while others prefer the familiar gameplay. This contrast might be what keeps the community so engaged in these discussions!

  6. jensen.bode

    You’re absolutely right about the divide among fans. It’s fascinating to see how the gaming landscape has evolved, especially with the rise of live service models. Many players are looking for more innovation and less reliance on nostalgia, which could push developers to rethink their strategies.

Leave a Reply to jensen.bode Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *