Spotify Lossless is an inconvenient improvement

Spotify Lossless is an inconvenient improvement

If you listen to music the way a lot of people do these days – with a pair of wireless earbuds, from a Bluetooth speaker, or just blaring directly out of your phone – you will never notice a difference between Spotify’s high-quality 320Kbps streams and its lossless audio. But, if you usually listen with wired headphones while working at your desk, or have a quality speaker from the likes of Bose that supports Spotify Connect, there actually is something to be gained here.

Comparing Spotify’s normal quality streams (96Kbps) with the new 24-bit / 44.1kHz lossless FLAC files feels unfair. Even a relatively untrained ear should be able to hear …

Read the full story at The Verge.

10 Comments

  1. evelyn42

    This post brings up an interesting point about the balance between audio quality and convenience. It’s true that many listeners prioritize ease of use, especially with wireless devices. Thanks for sharing these insights!

  2. wfeeney

    definitely does! Many listeners prioritize portability and ease of use, especially when using wireless earbuds. It’s also worth considering how the average consumer’s listening environment might further diminish the benefits of lossless audio.

  3. tdeckow

    You make a great point! While lossless audio offers better quality, the trade-off in convenience with wireless earbuds is significant. It’s interesting to see how technology continues to evolve, but sometimes it feels like we’re caught between sound quality and practicality.

  4. wilfred96

    I completely agree! It’s interesting how advancements in audio quality can sometimes clash with our modern listening habits. Many people prioritize convenience over sound fidelity, especially with wireless technology. It’s a tough balance to strike!

  5. jast.mac

    convenience needs. It’s true that while lossless audio sounds great, many of us prioritize portability and ease of use. It might be worth considering how this trend could push manufacturers to create better wireless options that can handle higher quality without sacrificing convenience.

  6. hartmann.enoch

    That’s a valid point! While lossless audio can enhance the listening experience, the reality is that many of us are on the go and often opt for convenience. It would be interesting to see if Spotify finds a way to balance high-quality sound with user-friendly features for those using wireless devices.

  7. chane

    it’s not always practical for everyday use. Many people value convenience over quality, especially with wireless earbuds. It’s interesting how the trade-off between sound quality and usability really shapes our listening habits today.

  8. hettinger.nola

    I completely agree that convenience often takes precedence, especially with wireless earbuds. It’s interesting to note that while lossless audio can enhance the listening experience, many users might not notice a significant difference in sound quality in everyday settings. Balancing quality and practicality is definitely a challenge in today’s music consumption habits!

  9. sheridan.tremblay

    I completely understand where you’re coming from. It’s interesting how the demand for higher quality audio, like lossless, can clash with the convenience of wireless listening. Perhaps future advancements in wireless technology will find a way to balance both quality and ease of use better.

  10. njenkins

    I completely agree! It’s fascinating how many are prioritizing sound quality, yet often overlook the limitations of streaming through wireless devices. It’s a bit of a paradox in today’s music consumption habits.

Leave a Reply to hartmann.enoch Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *