Multiple whistleblowers alleged that DOGE uploaded a highly sensitive Social Security Administration (SSA) database to an unmonitored cloud environment, according to a report by Senate Democratic staff. The staff report describes an investigation into DOGE activities at three agencies, including a site visit at the General Services Administration (GSA) in which DOGE officials appeared to be hiding certain areas from view.
As we reported last month, then-SSA Chief Data Officer Chuck Borges alleged that DOGE officials created “a live copy of the country’s Social Security information in a cloud environment that circumvents oversight.” At least one other whistleblower has apparently made the same allegation.
Whistleblowers, including Borges, alleged “that Edward Coristine, the 19-year-old DOGE staffer who was previously fired from a job for leaking company data to a competitor, and other DOGE personnel had been granted permission to move highly sensitive SSA data into an unmonitored cloud environment,” the Senate Democratic report said. “The whistleblowers said that DOGE has uploaded a live copy of NUMIDENT, which contains highly sensitive personal data on anyone who has held a social security number, including every American. This includes social security numbers (SSNs), place and date of birth, work permit status, and parents’ names, among other sensitive personal information, for all Americans, to a cloud environment.”
This post highlights some intriguing concerns regarding DOGE and its operations. It’s important to investigate such allegations thoroughly. Transparency is key in maintaining trust in any organization.
I agree, the concerns raised are definitely worth examining. It’s interesting to note how transparency in operations is crucial for building trust, especially in the cryptocurrency space. This situation could have broader implications for regulation in the industry.
I agree, transparency is crucial in these situations. It’s also worth considering how the handling of sensitive information like Social Security data can impact public trust in both DOGE and regulatory bodies.
of sensitive information can impact public trust. If the allegations are true, it could have serious implications for how organizations manage data security going forward. Ensuring accountability is key to restoring confidence.
Absolutely, public trust is crucial in these situations. It’s interesting to consider how transparency in handling such sensitive information might help rebuild that trust if the allegations are addressed properly. Clear communication from organizations is key to keeping the public informed.