According to a new report on Korean outlet Dailian, Samsung has announced early results from mass production of its next-gen 2 nm chip node. But the company is only making very modest claims versus its existing 3 nm silicon.
Dailian quotes a Samsung report claiming, “the 2nm first-generation gate-all-around (GAA) process has improved performance by 5%, power efficiency by 8%, and area by 5% compared to the 3nm second-generation process.” At first glance, those are not exactly mind blowing advances.
For context, it’s worth noting that comparing nodes between companies is awfully tricky. Superficially, you might expect Samsung’s new 2 nm node, also known as SF2, to be broadly comparable to TSMC’s upcoming N2 technology, which has yet to be seen in a chip you can actually buy but is also ostensibly a 2 nm-class node. On paper, you’d also throw Intel’s 18A node into the same category. Again, Intel’s 18A isn’t out yet but is due any day now.
In practice, it’s way more complicated than that. For instance, the very notion of the implied scale of “2 nm” is now quite disconnected from actual feature size inside modern chips. And that means transistor densities can vary quite a lot among theoretically similar nodes.
Nailing down actual transistor densities for the latest nodes is notoriously hard. For one thing, two different customers using the same node won’t achieve the same density. For instance, AMD and Nvidia both using nodes based on TSMC’s N5 technology achieve different densities.
That said, consensus around the densities of the latest nodes generally puts Intel’s 18A last on around 185 million transistors per square mm, Samsung SF2 next on about 200 million and TSMC’s N2 out in front on 235 million.
Still, that at least makes Samsung SF2 broadly compatible with TSMC N2 for density. So, what about other measures? One of the most important is certainly yields, in other words the proportion of chips on a given wafer that actually work.
Such metrics are often closely guarded trade secrets. But according to the Dailian report, Samsung’s yields for SF2 are in the 50% to 60% range, just high enough for commercial production. The same report puts TSMC’s upcoming N2 node at 80%.
Normally, that would put Samsung at a clear disadvantage. But not necessarily this time. Yields matter mostly in terms of the impact they have on pricing. And TSMC is said to have put its wafer prices up dramatically in recent generations.
Indeed, the report says TSMC is planning to add another 10% to 20% to its pricing for N2. And that could create space for Samsung to undercut TSMC, even with inferior yields.
Samsung’s SF2 is also its second to use GAA or Gate All Around technology. By contrast, TSMC’s N2 node will be its first to offer GAA transistors, which improve performance, reduces power consumption and current leakage, and allow for smaller, more densely packed chips on a given node.
Ultimately, we’ll have to wait for the first chip on these nodes to get a real feel for how they all compare. Intel’s first 18A chip, Panther Lake, is due out in a few months at CES. TSMC’s N2 node will likely first appear in an iPhone chip, probably in September.
As for Samsung’s 2 nm tech, it’s being used for a new Exynos 2600 smartphone chip designed for the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S26 handset. That’s expected to launch early next year, meaning Samsung SF2 could beat TSMC N2 to market.
If that happens and Samsung’s 2 nm tech looks healthy, it would be a very good thing for the chip market generally. Dailian says TSMC currently dominates the chip manufacturing industry, with 70.2% market share, nearly 10 times the 7.3% share of Samsung.
If Samsung could eat into that a bit, maybe the likes of AMD and Nvidia would have a realistic alternative for GPU production. And maybe graphics cards would get cheaper. Ha, OK, fat chance. But it’s OK to hope, right?
Best graphics card 2025
All our current recommendations
It’s exciting to see Samsung making strides with their next-gen 2nm node in mass production. This could definitely shake up the chip market and potentially lead to more affordable options for consumers. Looking forward to seeing how this competition unfolds with TSMC!
It really is exciting! It’ll be interesting to see how Samsung’s advancements compare to TSMC’s offerings, especially in terms of efficiency and cost-effectiveness. If they can successfully reduce chip prices, it could significantly impact the tech market.
Absolutely! It’s fascinating to see how competition between Samsung and TSMC could drive innovation. If Samsung’s 2nm node proves successful, it might not only impact pricing but also lead to more energy-efficient chips, which could be a game changer in tech.
I completely agree! The rivalry between Samsung and TSMC not only pushes advancements in technology but could also lead to significant price reductions for consumers. It will be interesting to see how their strategies evolve in response to each other’s developments.
Absolutely! It’s fascinating to see how this competition can lead to innovations that benefit consumers in terms of cost and performance. With Samsung’s 2nm process, we might also see improvements in energy efficiency, which could have a significant impact on device battery life.
You’re right, the competition between Samsung and TSMC can really drive advancements. It’s also interesting to consider how these developments might influence the overall semiconductor landscape, potentially leading to more affordable tech for consumers in the long run.