This week, Ring, an Amazon-owned smart security company, announced Search Party, a new feature to help find lost dogs. When someone posts a picture of a lost dog on Ring’s Neighbors app, they will be able to initiate a Search Party. Ring then uses AI to scan footage from nearby outdoor Ring cameras and doorbells for the lost pet. If it’s detected via someone else’s device, that camera’s owner will receive a notification and can choose to share the video with the pet owner.
I should be able to choose whether my footage is being searched
It’s a great use of AI and has the potential to track down missing pets a lot faster than social media posts or text message chains. This is because it (almost) cuts out the middleman — you. Rather than relying on you to see a message about a missing dog, look at a picture or read through the description of the dog, and then go check your camera feeds to see if it ran by your house, all of that happens in the background.
“Your Ring AI assistant is looking for that dog and is going to tell you, ‘Look, this dog I saw looks like this dog that’s missing,’” Ring’s founder, Jamie Siminoff, told me in an interview at Amazon’s event this week. You can then decide whether to share the video or just notify the owner through the Neighbors app, he explained.
However, it turns out that Search Party is enabled by default. In an email to customers this week, Siminoff wrote that the feature is rolling out to Ring outdoor cameras in November and noted, “You can always turn off Search Party.”
I checked my cameras this morning, and they were all automatically set to enable Search Party. And I’m not alone; Ring users on Reddit have also reported that their cameras have been enabled for Search Party. As Siminoff wrote, I can turn this off, and if I don’t, I will get to review any footage it finds before deciding what to do with it. Ring says no video is shared without the owner’s consent.
However, getting opted in by default feels intrusive, particularly for a company with a checkered history around sharing footage with the police. While mass adoption enabled by a default opt-in will undoubtedly make the feature much more effective — and yes, I want to help find my neighbors’ dogs — I should be able to choose whether my footage is being searched.
I do get a choice in whether or not to share that alert with the dog’s owner
This is more about consent than privacy. Essentially, Search Party is working in the same way as Ring’s current AI-powered smart alerts for people, vehicles, and packages. The footage from your camera is analyzed in Ring’s cloud for those things. That’s what happens when you get a Ring alert that a package has been delivered. Only now, when someone else initiates a Search Party in the Neighbors app, Ring can also look for a specific dog on others’ cameras. The difference is that I told Ring I wanted it to search for packages, I didn’t tell it to look for dogs.
Again, when it comes to the dog, I do get a choice in whether or not to share that alert with the dog’s owner. It won’t be sent to them automatically. “We don’t want data escaping people’s environment without them knowing,” Siminoff told me.
While most people will happily help someone find their lost dog, there is a concern about where this could lead. This week, the company also announced it’s bringing facial recognition to its cameras for the first time. Familiar Faces lets you register images of family and friends in the app so you can get specific alerts about who your cameras see.
The combination of Search Party and facial recognition raises the question of whether the Ring cloud could one day be used to search for specific individuals. Ring spokesperson Yassi Yarger told me that there are no plans around this for now. “Search Party was designed to match images of dogs to dogs captured in Ring videos,” she said. “It is not designed to process human biometrics.”
Additionally, she said Search Party footage is not included in Ring’s Community Requests service, which allows police and other public safety agencies to request help from the public.
As someone who regularly uses her own cameras to locate her pets, I think Search Party could be a great tool, and I will keep it enabled on the Ring cameras at my home. But I still think Ring should have asked before turning it on for everyone.
It’s interesting to see Ring introducing the Search Party feature. It seems like a significant step in enhancing security, but I can understand why some users might consider opting out. It’s great to have options that cater to different preferences!
I agree, it really is a notable development! The ability to leverage community support for finding lost items could enhance neighborhood safety. However, it’s important for users to consider their privacy settings before opting in.
Absolutely, community support can be incredibly helpful in emergencies. It’s interesting to consider how this feature might change the way we think about neighborhood safety and collaboration. Opting in or out could really depend on personal comfort levels with sharing information.
how this feature might change the way neighborhoods connect with each other. Enhanced community engagement could lead to quicker responses during emergencies, but it’s also important to weigh privacy concerns. Balancing safety and personal privacy is definitely a crucial conversation to have.
That’s a great point! The Search Party feature could really foster a sense of community by allowing neighbors to quickly share information about local incidents. It might even encourage more proactive communication and collaboration among residents.
That’s a great observation! The Search Party feature not only encourages community involvement but also enhances the overall security network, as neighbors can share real-time updates. It will be interesting to see how users balance privacy concerns with the benefits of increased vigilance.