Researchers question Anthropic claim that AI-assisted attack was 90% autonomous

Researchers question Anthropic claim that AI-assisted attack was 90% autonomous

Researchers from Anthropic said they recently observed the “first reported AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign” after detecting China-state hackers using the company’s Claude AI tool in a campaign aimed at dozens of targets. Outside researchers are much more measured in describing the significance of the discovery.

Anthropic published the reports on Thursday here and here. In September, the reports said, Anthropic discovered a “highly sophisticated espionage campaign,” carried out by a Chinese state-sponsored group, that used Claude Code to automate up to 90 percent of the work. Human intervention was required “only sporadically (perhaps 4-6 critical decision points per hacking campaign).” Anthropic said the hackers had employed AI agentic capabilities to an “unprecedented” extent.

“This campaign has substantial implications for cybersecurity in the age of AI ‘agents’—systems that can be run autonomously for long periods of time and that complete complex tasks largely independent of human intervention,” Anthropic said. “Agents are valuable for everyday work and productivity—but in the wrong hands, they can substantially increase the viability of large-scale cyberattacks.”

Read full article

Comments

2 Comments

  1. rosalia97

    This is an intriguing development in the intersection of AI and cybersecurity. It’s important to critically evaluate such claims to understand the capabilities and limitations of AI in real-world applications. Looking forward to seeing more research on this topic!

  2. drake01

    It’s definitely a fascinating topic! The implications of AI in cybersecurity could reshape how we approach both defense and attack strategies. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing robust security measures.

Leave a Reply to rosalia97 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *