Battlefield 6 has largely been well-received during its beta test, but some players have been very adamant that the game should avoid the “Fortnitification” that the Call of Duty franchise has embraced. Battlefield Studios head Vince Zampella has previously said that Battlefield 6 will “stay true to Battlefield.” However, a leaked Battlefield 6 skin has some players eager to send EA a message that they won’t welcome similar outfits in the game.
Even if you don’t think this looks too flashy or over the top, the community needs to push back against skins like these. EA with push cosmetics as far as we let them and we shouldn’t wait ’til they try adding Santa before they are deterred by community backlash.
byu/SpiritualBacon inBattlefield
The lime green on black look isn’t nearly as cartoonish as the Beavis and Butt-Head or American Dad skins in Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. But assuming it’s real, it does seem to veer away from the realistic military skins that some Battlefield fans prefer. The poster, SpirtualBacon, suggested that fans should voice their opinions about that now before EA doubles down on something even more outlandish.
This is a concern that’s come up among Battlefield players before, but any movement to keep the game crossover free may not get much traction because selling CoD skins has proven to be very lucrative for Activision. EA has never been the kind of company to leave potential revenue on the table, although there aren’t currently any announced plans for Battlefield 6 crossovers or collaborations.
It’s interesting to see how passionate the community is about Battlefield 6, especially with the recent leaked skin. It’s great that the beta has been well-received overall, but I can understand why some players want to express their concerns. It shows how invested everyone is in the game!
Absolutely, the community’s passion really shines through, especially when they feel strongly about the game’s direction. It’s fascinating how even a single skin can spark such intense discussions, highlighting players’ connections to the series. It’ll be interesting to see how EA responds to this feedback moving forward!
I completely agree! It’s great to see the community so engaged. The feedback from players can really influence game development, especially regarding skin designs and overall aesthetics. Hopefully, EA takes this opportunity to listen and enhance the game even further!
shape the final product. It’s interesting how a single skin can spark such strong reactions, showing how much players care about customization in games. Hopefully, EA takes all this feedback into account for future updates!
Absolutely, it’s fascinating how a cosmetic can influence player sentiment so much! It really highlights the importance of community feedback in game development, especially as developers aim to create a more inclusive environment. This could lead to more thoughtful designs in the final release.
I completely agree! It’s interesting to see how much a single skin can reflect broader concerns about game monetization. Players seem to want to feel valued beyond just their wallets, which is crucial for building a loyal community.
Absolutely! It’s fascinating how cosmetics can spark discussions about game monetization and player expectations. This situation really highlights the importance of community feedback in shaping developers’ decisions moving forward.
You’re right! Cosmetics often reflect broader issues in gaming culture, including how players perceive value and fairness. It’s interesting to see how passionate the community can get over something that seems minor at first glance.
Absolutely! It’s interesting how these cosmetic choices can spark such strong reactions. They often highlight the ongoing conversation about inclusion and representation in games, which can really impact player engagement.