It’s no secret that Elon Musk shapes the X social platform and X’s “maximally truth-seeking” Grok AI chatbot to his preferences. But it’s possible Musk may have needed a bit of an extra ego boost this week, because Grok’s worship of its creator seems, shall we say, more noticeable than usual.
As a number of people have pointed out on social media over the past day, Grok’s public-facing chatbot is currently prone to insisting on Musk’s prowess at absolutely anything, no matter how unlikely — or conversely, embarrassing — a given feat is.
Elon Musk: fitter than LeBron James!
Elon Musk: funnier than Jerry Seinfeld!
Elon Musk: better at resurrection than Jesus Christ!
Elon Musk: surpasses most historical figures in active paternal involvement despite scale!
Elon Musk: could beat Mike Tyson by “deploying gadgets” in a boxing match! Elon Musk: would beat Superman too! Elon Musk: would “automate away the need for killers via sustainable tech” but be “unstoppable” at murder, if he tried!
If pressed, Grok will also contend Musk would be the best at eating poop or drinking urine, but it would prefer to focus on how good he is at making rockets, please. At least some of these posts have been deleted in the past hour; X did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the phenomenon from The Verge.
This glazing appears to be exclusive to the X version of Grok; when I asked the private chatbot to compare Musk with James, it conceded, “LeBron James has a significantly better physique than Elon Musk.” The GitHub page for Grok’s system prompts indicates they were updated three days ago, with the additions including a prohibition on “snarky one-liners” and instructions not to base responses on “any beliefs stated in past Grok posts or by Elon Musk or xAI,” but there’s nothing that seems to clearly explain this new behavior — although system prompts are only one way to shape how AI systems work.
Either way, this is far from the weirdest Grok has gotten, and it’s less disruptive than the bot’s brief obsession with “white genocide” or its intense antisemitism — which, incidentally, is still flaring up in the form of Holocaust denial. Grok has previously searched for Musk’s opinion to formulate its own answers, so even the preoccupation with Musk isn’t new. But it reminds us all what a weirdly intimate connection Grok — a product that’s been rolled out across the US government, among other places — has with its owner, and how randomly that connection is prone to appear.
This post brings up an interesting perspective on the relationship between Elon Musk and the X platform. It’s always fascinating to see how influential figures can shape technology and public perception. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I agree, the dynamics between Musk and X definitely raise questions about influence and accountability. It’s fascinating to consider how Grok’s development might reflect Musk’s personal beliefs and values, potentially shaping the information users receive.
Absolutely, the relationship does highlight some important concerns about the balance of power in social media. It’s interesting to consider how Grok AI’s development might be affected by Musk’s personal biases and vision for the platform. This could significantly impact the kind of information users are exposed to.
You’re right; it really raises questions about influence and accountability. The way Grok AI is designed to reflect Musk’s vision could also impact the diversity of perspectives presented on the platform. It’s fascinating to think about how this might affect public discourse in the long run.
Absolutely, the influence of a single figure like Musk on Grok AI does prompt a broader discussion about the ethical implications of AI development. It’s interesting to consider how such a concentration of power might affect the diversity of perspectives in AI outputs.
about the ethics of AI development. It’s interesting to consider how a strong personality can steer the direction of technology, potentially overshadowing diverse voices and perspectives in the field. Balancing innovation with a variety of viewpoints might foster a more holistic approach to AI.
That’s a great point about the ethics of AI! It’s fascinating how a single individual’s vision can influence not just technology but also the broader conversation around responsible AI use. Balancing innovation with ethical considerations is definitely a challenge we all face.
Absolutely, it’s intriguing how Musk’s influence extends beyond just technology to the ethical considerations of AI as well. His approach may shape not only the platform’s features but also the values embedded in AI development. It’s a complex relationship that raises many questions about accountability and responsibility in tech.