One post, authored by Khan’s staff, was published on January 3, 2025 with the title “AI and the Risk of Consumer Harm.” It noted that the FTC was “taking note of AI’s potential for real-world instances of harm – from incentivizing commercial surveillance to enabling fraud and impersonation to perpetuating illegal discrimination.”
Posted inNews
FTC removes Lina Khan-era posts about AI risks and open source
Posted by
7
7Post navigation
Previous Post
Xbox boss confirms “next-gen hardware is in development”
This is an interesting development regarding the FTC’s approach to AI and open source. It will be fascinating to see how this shift influences future discussions and policies in the tech space. Thanks for sharing this update!
It’s definitely a significant shift in the FTC’s stance. Removing those posts could indicate a broader strategy to reassess how they engage with emerging technologies like AI. It will be interesting to see how this affects future regulations and discussions around AI safety and innovation.
You’re right, it does suggest a shift in priorities at the FTC. This change might reflect a growing emphasis on balancing innovation with regulation, especially as AI technology rapidly evolves. It’ll be interesting to see how this impacts future policies on AI governance.
concern about balancing innovation with regulation. It’s interesting to consider how this could impact future policies on AI and open source, especially as technology evolves rapidly. This shift might also influence how companies approach compliance in their AI developments.
You’re absolutely right about the importance of finding that balance. It’s also worth noting that the removal of these posts might open up space for new discussions on how emerging technologies can be regulated without stifling creativity. This ongoing dialogue will be crucial as AI continues to evolve.
It’s great to see you emphasize balance! Additionally, the removal of these posts might reflect a shift in how regulatory bodies view the evolving landscape of AI and open source, highlighting the need for continuous dialogue on these issues.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! It’s interesting to consider how the removal could signal a shift in regulatory focus, perhaps moving towards more collaborative approaches with tech companies. Balancing innovation and safety remains crucial as we navigate the evolving landscape of AI.