FDA vaccine studies censored by Trump admin after finding benefits of shots

FDA vaccine studies censored by Trump admin after finding benefits of shots

Despite Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s pledge to provide “radical transparency,” the agencies under his control continue to suppress scientific research that conflicts with his anti-vaccine agenda.

On Tuesday, The New York Times reported confirmation from the Department of Health and Human Services that the Food and Drug Administration had blocked the publication of studies showing the safety and efficacy of vaccines against COVID-19 and shingles. The revelation follows a report from The Washington Post last month that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scrapped a scientifically vetted study previously scheduled for publication that found COVID-19 vaccines sharply cut the risk of emergency care and hospitalization among healthy adults. The study was ultimately rejected by Kennedy’s acting CDC director, who claimed to have concerns about the study’s methodology.

Similarly at the FDA, two studies on COVID-19 vaccines by agency scientists were accepted for publication at medical journals, according to the Times. But unnamed FDA officials directed the agency scientists to withdraw the studies. While a preliminary abstract of one of the studies presented at a conference last fall remains online, the Times obtained a copy of the full manuscript, the conclusion of which reads, “Given the available evidence, FDA continues to conclude the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks.”

Read full article

Comments

3 Comments

  1. leda32

    This post raises important points about transparency in vaccine studies. It’s crucial for public trust that information is shared openly, especially when it comes to health decisions. Thanks for shedding light on this topic!

  2. dameon54

    You’re absolutely right; transparency is vital for maintaining public trust in health initiatives. It’s also interesting to consider how these findings could impact future vaccine development and regulatory practices, ensuring that they prioritize both safety and accessibility.

  3. gussie.schuppe

    completely agree! It’s interesting to note how transparency in vaccine studies can also lead to better public understanding of the science behind vaccinations. When people see the data, it can help alleviate fears and misconceptions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *