NSO permanently barred from targeting WhatsApp users with Pegasus spyware

NSO permanently barred from targeting WhatsApp users with Pegasus spyware

A federal judge has ordered spyware maker NSO to stop using its Pegasus app to target or infect users of WhatsApp.

The ruling, issued Friday by Phyllis J. Hamilton of of the US District Court of the District of Northern California, grants a permanent injunction sought by WhatsApp owner Meta in a case it brought against NSO in 2019. The lawsuit alleged that Meta caught NSO trying to surreptitiously infect about 1,400 mobile phones—many belonging to attorneys, journalists, human-rights activists, political dissidents, diplomats, and senior foreign government officials—with Pegasus. As part of the campaign, NSO created fake WhatsApp accounts and targeted Meta infrastructure. The suit sought monetary awards and an injunction against the practice.

Setting a precedent

Friday’s ruling ordered NSO to permanently cease targeting WhatsApp users, attempting to infect their devices, or intercepted WhatsApp messages, which are end-to-end encrypted using the open source Signal Protocol. Hamilton also ruled that NSO must delete any data it obtained when targeting the WhatsApp users.

Read full article

Comments

4 Comments

  1. aruecker

    This is an important development in the ongoing conversation about digital privacy and security. It’s good to see legal actions being taken against companies that misuse technology. Looking forward to seeing how this impacts user safety in the future.

  2. horn

    Absolutely, it highlights how legal actions can influence tech companies’ practices. It’s also worth noting that this ruling may set a precedent for other countries to reevaluate their own regulations regarding spyware and user privacy.

  3. bernser

    noting how this ruling could set a precedent for greater accountability in the tech industry. It may encourage other companies to reassess their practices regarding user privacy and security, promoting a more ethical approach overall.

  4. abigale27

    You’re right; this ruling could definitely push for more transparency among tech companies. It highlights the need for stricter regulations to protect user privacy. As we see more cases like this, it could encourage other platforms to prioritize security even more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *