Inside the White House shitposting machine

Inside the White House shitposting machine

Screens at the White House display AI-modified videos of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that were shared on social media by President Donald Trump. | Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Hello and welcome to Regulator, a newsletter for Verge subscribers about the technology, broligarchs and brainrot rapidly transforming politics and civic society. Not subscribed to The Verge yet? You should! It can materially improve your life.

Last week was a grim reminder that no matter what sort of horror is being perpetrated or how many people end up dead, the Trump administration’s knee-jerk response is to shitpost through it. The White House’s response on X to abducting the head of a sovereign nation? “FAFO”. The response to an ICE agent shooting a woman in broad daylight? A Buzzfeed-style listicle of “57 Times Sick, Unhinged Democrat …

Read the full story at The Verge.

4 Comments

  1. labadie.ian

    This post offers an intriguing look into the intersection of technology and politics. It’s fascinating to see how AI is being utilized in such high-profile contexts. The implications of this kind of content could spark interesting discussions.

  2. derrick36

    I agree, it’s definitely a captivating blend of tech and politics! It’s interesting to consider how these AI-modified videos could influence public perception and political discourse. It raises questions about the ethics of using such technology in a political context.

  3. west.christina

    the use of AI in politics can change public perception. It raises questions about authenticity and the impact of manipulated content on our understanding of political figures. It’s a fascinating yet complex intersection!

  4. cielo21

    You bring up a great point about authenticity! It’s interesting to consider how these AI-modified videos could not only influence public perception but also shape the narrative around political figures. The potential for misrepresentation is definitely something to keep an eye on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *