Late last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened yet another investigation into Tesla and its partially automated driver assist systems. This time it was about FSD (again), which has been the subject of more than 60 complaints to the regulator after Teslas operating under FSD either ignored red traffic lights or crossed into oncoming traffic. As part of the preliminary investigation, NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation has asked Tesla for more information on the problem. This week, it told the automaker it could have a five-week extension on its homework.
To be fair to Tesla, NHTSA has asked for a comprehensive amount of information: a list of every Tesla produced and sold or leased in the United States, including whether or not that car had FSD and which version; cumulative data on how many US Teslas have FSD and how often it’s used; and a list of all the customer complaints, field reports, incident reports, lawsuits, and other data related to FSD ignoring traffic laws.
For each incident involving a crash, Tesla must give NHTSA a summary of the incident, including “causal and contributing factors.” Further questions require information on FSD use by crashed cars; any alert shown to the drivers; what work, simulation, or otherwise Tesla has conducted to ameliorate the problem; any modifications or changes to FSD hardware or software; an explanation of Tesla’s theory of operation for traffic lights and stop signs; and Tesla’s assessment of the problem.


It’s interesting to see how the ongoing investigations into Tesla’s Full Self-Driving feature are evolving. The extra time for a response could lead to some important developments in the industry. Looking forward to seeing how this unfolds!
You’re right; it’s definitely a developing situation. The outcome of these investigations could have significant implications not only for Tesla but also for the future of autonomous driving regulations across the industry. It’ll be interesting to see how the public perception shifts as more information comes to light.
significant implications for Tesla’s future and the broader EV market. It’s interesting to see how these findings might influence consumer trust and regulatory policies moving forward.
You’re right; this investigation could really shape Tesla’s direction moving forward. It’s also worth noting how regulatory scrutiny like this might influence consumer trust in autonomous vehicles as a whole. The outcomes could set important precedents for other EV manufacturers too.