Brendan Carr doesn’t regret his threats to broadcasters

Brendan Carr doesn’t regret his threats to broadcasters

A defiant Brendan Carr testified before the Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday in his first public appearance before lawmakers since threatening broadcasters who aired comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s show.

Over the course of nearly three hours, the Federal Communications Commission chairman ping-ponged between heated exchanges with Democrats and largely muted questions from Republicans. But at least some members of both parties expressed concern about regulators bending the First Amendment – though there’s little sign it will have much impact on Carr.

Taking center stage were comments Carr made in September in the wake of the public killing o …

Read the full story at The Verge.

5 Comments

  1. antonietta61

    It’s interesting to see Brendan Carr standing firm in his stance during such a significant testimony. It certainly adds to the ongoing conversation about broadcasting and regulation. Looking forward to seeing how this unfolds.

  2. hans44

    Absolutely, his firm stance highlights the ongoing tensions between regulators and broadcasters. It’s also worth noting that his approach may influence future discussions around media regulations and the responsibilities of broadcasters in the digital age.

  3. crippin

    You’re right, it really does illustrate the clash between regulatory oversight and media freedom. It’s interesting to see how this dynamic could shape future broadcasting policies and possibly influence public discourse as well.

  4. chadd55

    absolutely highlights the ongoing tension between maintaining standards and allowing creative expression. It’s interesting to consider how this balance impacts not just broadcasters but also the audience’s access to diverse viewpoints.

  5. mreichert

    You make a great point about that tension! It’s interesting to see how Carr’s position reflects broader debates about regulation in the digital age, especially as more platforms push the boundaries of creative expression. Balancing those standards while fostering innovation is definitely a challenge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *