The general consensus on Batman Forever has come a long way since Joel Schumacher gave the Caped Crusader latex nipples in 1995. At the time, the film and its 1997 follow-up were viewed as a campy bastardization of the franchise that failed to capture the gothic darkness of Tim Burtonโs adaptations. Three decades later, however, most fans are willing to admit that Schumacherโs take on the genre has its place in the pantheon of great superhero filmmaking. However, Iโd like to take this re-evaluation one step further with a bold statement: Batman Forever is far more faithful to the spirit and mythos of the comics than itโs ever been given credit for, and Schumacher probably understood the Dark Knight better than Burton ever did.

It’s great to see Batman Forever getting some recognition! It’s interesting how perspectives on films can change over time. Streaming it on Paramount Plus makes it easy for fans to revisit or discover it anew.
have shifted over time. Nostalgia plays a big role in this, and many fans are revisiting the film with a fresh lens. It’s fascinating to see how the vibrant visuals and unique take on the characters resonate differently with audiences today compared to the ’90s.
Absolutely, nostalgia definitely influences perceptions! It’s interesting to see how the film’s unique aesthetic and campy charm are being appreciated more now, especially compared to the darker tones of recent adaptations. It really showcases the variety of storytelling within the Batman universe.